Firearms media is enormous and mostly unexamined. Millions of people watch range tests, first looks, and gear breakdowns every week, and almost nobody covers that output the way trade press covers any other industry: what got made, what it claims, whether the claims hold, and what the argument underneath actually is.
The Reticle exists to do that work. We publish two kinds of pieces and we label them without ambiguity. News summarizes what a video, launch, or policy change actually says — verified, sourced, and written straight. If a fact in a news piece is wrong, we correct it and log the correction. Opinion is argued. An opinion piece postulates a stance, builds the case for it, engages the strongest version of the other side, and signs its name. We write from a Second Amendment rights perspective and we say so plainly — the reader should never have to guess where a piece stands.
We cover work, not people. A review can be wrong without its maker being a fraud; an argument can fail without its author being a villain. We hold that line even when it would be easier not to.
Say something
Every piece takes a position or explains precisely why it will not. Summary without judgment is a press release.
Show the work
Every piece links its source. Opinion pieces carry a “Room for disagreement” section — the strongest opposing case, steelmanned, in our own words.
Answer for it
Corrections are logged, dated, and left visible. Being readable is not an excuse for being wrong.
The desk
Marcus Hale
Senior Editor
J.D. Whitfield
Industry Correspondent
Coleman Reyes
Policy Correspondent
Tess Marlowe
Media Reporter
Avery Lindqvist
Contributing Editor, Ballistics
The Editorial Board
The Reticle