Rules, rulings, and rights — reported plainly, argued from a Second Amendment point of view.
In Texas v. ATF, the last pending pistol brace lawsuit, DOJ asks Judge Drew Tipton to dismiss it as moot while Texas and GOA say the ATF's SBR theory keeps claims alive.
Read the pieceNew Jersey suppressor ban suit Padua v. Platkin is on hold at summary judgment while the state asks to wait for the Supreme Court's AR-15 rulings.
Read the pieceAR-15 ban cases Viramontes v. Cook County and Grant v. Higgins go to Supreme Court argument Dec. 2, and the Solicitor General wants 10 minutes to argue the bans are unconstitutional.
A Justice Department opinion says the federal ban on dealer handgun sales to 18- to 20-year-olds is unconstitutional. Colion Noir calls it a win written in pencil.
Permit-to-purchase licensing is the next threat to gun ownership, says Rocky Mountain Gun Owners' Viramontes amicus brief. The diagnosis is right; the remedy isn't coming from this case.
Colion Noir's video on a fatal Memphis home invasion argues the surviving intruder could still face a homicide charge. Tennessee felony murder law is narrower than that.
Michigan's proof-of-citizenship and voter ID amendment fell three signatures short of the November ballot. Armed Scholar walks through the emergency application now sitting with Justice Kavanaugh.
Thailand suspended new firearm purchase permits after two shootings near Bangkok. Colion Noir's video argues the country's roughly 4 million unregistered guns undercut the crackdown.
New Jersey's magazine ban appeal and California's Duncan v. Bonta petition now put the same Second Amendment question before the Supreme Court from opposite directions.
Australia's NSW gun buyback — 274,000 firearms, 50,000 licence holders — anchors a new Colion Noir video arguing the 1996 confiscation never delivered what it promised.
Case v. Montana set warrantless emergency-aid entry at an objectively reasonable basis, not probable cause. An Armed Scholar video presents the January ruling as a new nationwide rule.
ATF's 2022 frame or receiver rule is void for vagueness and violates the Second Amendment, a federal judge in Texas ruled, enjoining enforcement against Defense Distributed and SAF members.
